Service2Client | Katharos Business Advisors

How to Account for Bad Debt Expense

Bad debt expense is an important concept that businesses must account for when it comes to their financial reporting. Regardless of the timeframe a company accounts for, it helps companies determine what portion of their receivables are collectible and what portion are not – and therefore, a bad debt expense. Depending on the receivables’ amount, this bad debt expense can take the form of either the allowance method or the direct write-off method.

Direct Write-Off Method Explained

While a company can see its receivables increase quickly, collections of these receivables might not be possible in the future due to client defaults. The direct write-off method is recommended for accounts with nominal amounts in question. A company’s receivables account sees an immediate write-off with this method. This lowers a company’s revenue, reducing net income. When it comes to accounting for it properly, the journal entry for the direct write-off method is as follows:

Description	Debit	Credit
Bad Debt Expense	$500
Accounts Receivable – ABC Business		$500

Description: Uncollectible ABC Account

Therefore, the journal entry would debit $500 to the Bad Debt Expense and credit $500 to the Accounts Receivable for the ABC Account.

Allowance Method

When it comes to more substantive or material amounts, businesses are inclined to use the Allowance Method because it’s set up to interact well with contra asset accounts that offset accounts receivable. Reported on the balance sheet, a contra asset account has an opposite balance to accounts receivable, and the journal entry is as follows:

Assets

Cash: $500,000

Accounts receivable: $300,000

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts: $25,000

Equipment: $200,000

Less Accumulated Depreciation: $5,000

Building: $100,000

Less Accumulated Depreciation: $15,000

Since there’s zero impact on income statement accounts, contra accounts are advantageous for companies to use since the revenues aren’t lowered from a direct loss that bad debt expenses can cause with other methods.

When it comes to the Allowance Method in action, the three components are as follows:

First Step: Assess the uncollectible receivables

This is done by either determining the percentage of sales or by the percentage of receivables.

Percentage of Sales Method

This is usually determined by taking a percentage of either net or total credit sales. It’s generally dictated by past trends (both internal and macro economy forecast). For example, 2 percent of $10,000,000 = $200,000.

Percentage of Receivables

This method works by looking at the aging schedule for receivables, including those that are due but not yet late. For example, the receivables that are not late but not yet paid can have a low percentage for the particular bucket. Each successive and later bucket of unpaid receivables would require a higher percentage estimated as uncollectible.

Second Step: Journal entries are notated by entering the bad debt expense as a debit and the allowance for doubtful accounts as a credit.

Third Step: After an account is considered permanently uncollectible, the last two entries are as follows:

Description	Debit	Credit
Bad Debt Expense	$250
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		$250
Description	Debit	Credit
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	$250
Accounts Receivable – ABC Business		$250

Conclusion: The Importance of Calculating Bad Debt Expense

When it comes to determining a company’s results, it is required in their financial statements. If a company does not include this information, their assets could be inflated, potentially leading to overstating their net income. Calculating bad debt expense also helps companies determine which customers have defaulted on past bills, while at the same time highlighting customers that pay on time.

When it comes to accounting for bad debt expense, businesses that are experts at the two methods can effectively navigate the needs of internal and external audiences.

Cash Flow Available for Debt Service (CFADS)

When it comes to the risk of default, Moody’s found that during COVID-19, American businesses had a 7.8 percent chance of defaulting. This is compared to a low of 4 percent in 2021, but lower than the current 9.2 percent risk of default, according to a March 2025 report by the rating agency.

Also known as cash flow available for debt service, CFADS determines how much cash is available to service debt obligations. It looks at different cash inflows/outflows to show both internal (owners and managers) and external audiences (investors) how efficient (or not) a business is in its ability to produce cash flows and manage its debts without defaulting.

While one method businesses use is balancing client sales, it is also common to look at various accounting entries, including Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA). The results of CFADS are often used by financial analysts when creating coverage ratios, including the project life coverage ratio (PLCR), the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), and the loan life coverage ratio (LLCR). It can sometimes take the place of EBITDA in certain circumstances. It’s important to note that the three coverage ratios show how well a plan is able to service and not default on debt throughout the entire project’s period.

For example, the DSCR = CFADS / Scheduled Debt Service (Interest + Principal Obligations)

Once this is calculated based on the company’s project specifications, if the result is greater than 1, then it signifies and gives greater confidence to internal and external audiences that the company will be able to meet its milestones and final payments.

The most efficient formula for calculating CFADS is as follows:

EBITDA – Taxes – Positive or Negative Result of Working Capital – Capital Expenditures for Maintenance Only

$200,000 (EBITDA) – $30,000 (Taxes) + $20,000 (assuming there’s a negative $20,000 change in working capital) – $40,000 (assuming the capital expenditure investing in maintenance)

CFADS = $150,000

Sometimes the calculation includes dividends, which need to be factored into the calculation. This example assumes it is not part of the calculation.

Interpreting Results

It’s important to understand that a more detailed analysis helps all audiences determine if the projected cash flow is available for different claimants of the business. While most of the calculations are done via the waterfall model, it’s important to analyze it based upon senior and junior debt, along with equity. If a company declares bankruptcy, senior debt holders are the first priority to be made whole (or as whole as possible, depending on the circumstances). Senior debt is collateralized or secured with company assets that are sold off during bankruptcy. From there, junior debt holders are next in line, followed by convertible note holders, then preferred stockholders, and finally common stockholders.

While this calculation is only one part of the way internal and external stakeholders can measure a company’s financial health, with the chance of more firms defaulting on debt, it’s another tool in a financial analyst’s toolbox.

Financial Implications of Marriage

Marriage isn’t just about two people who fall in love and choose to spend the rest of their lives together. It is also a contract. And while that contract might not be forever binding, marriage does come with certain financial and familial obligations regardless of whether the couple stays married or not.

That is why it is critical for couples to discuss their finances and goals early in the game. In fact, the best time to begin this conversation is actually before they begin making wedding plans. That’s because weddings can be very expensive. If the couple bears this expense, they will remove funds from their future plans and opportunities, which they should consider carefully before designing a wedding budget.

However, many times the parents of a couple will pay for the wedding. In this scenario, the newlyweds should consider how the cost of an expensive wedding would impact the paying party’s long-term financial situation. This is important because bankrupt parents could lead to a potential live-in caregiving situation once they are too old to take care of themselves. That’s quite a trade-off for a $100,000 wedding.

Takeaway: Regardless of who pays for the wedding, moderation is perhaps both prudent and considerate.

Partners also should share information about their earnings, assets, debts, and credit reports before getting married. They should discuss their career goals, preferences for children, type of housing, living location(s), and any big-ticket dreams, such as an expensive vacation or starting their own business. Together, the couple should consider each other’s goals and develop a plan to achieve those goals given their combined financial situation.

Takeaway: Note that while each spouse retains their own credit score and liability for debts prior to the marriage, joint debts acquired during the marriage are recorded on both credit reports.

Once married, couples often assume respective responsibilities, such as household earner and bill payer, while the other is a homemaker and primary child caregiver. From a financial perspective, this is not wise. It’s better for the marriage when each spouse takes turns managing finances, including paying bills, learning about investing and working with a financial advisor if they have one, being on all the joint accounts (home deed, insurance policies, etc.) and even each having their own retirement account (e.g., IRA, employer-sponsored retirement plan).

Takeaway: A collaborative approach to finances enables transparency so each spouse is aware of the other’s spending habits and bill-paying discipline.

The relationship tends to have more balance if each spouse has their own money, even if they do not work outside the home. If both spouses work, they could each have a checking account for their own personal expenses as well as a joint account used to pay for communal expenses like rent/mortgage, utilities, food, and upkeep.

Takeaway: A higher-earning spouse may contribute to a lower/no-earning spouse’s Roth IRA so that person has income to manage as they see fit.

Shared finances among married couples do offer certain benefits, such as lower costs for housing, health, long-term care, and auto insurance premiums. With particular regard to health insurance, consider if one spouse should join the other’s plan and how that might impact premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket expenses.

Takeaway: Find out if either spouses’ employer offers an incentive for declining coverage. This bonus income provides a good reason to join the other spouse’s plan.

Couples also have the option to compare the advantages of filing joint or separate tax returns, which may be impacted by one partner’s medical expenses or student loan debt. Also, be aware that no matter what time of year you have your wedding, as long as you are married as of Dec. 31, the IRS considers you married for the whole year for tax-filing purposes.

Takeaway: If one spouse is on an income-based student loan debt repayment plan, be aware that filing jointly with two incomes may result in higher payments than if they file separately.

Right after the wedding, there are several actions most couples should take. For example, report any name changes to the Social Security Administration; update any address changes with the Postal Service, employers, and the IRS; and supply your employers with a new W-4 withholding form.

Takeaway: If you’re taking an extended honeymoon, you might want to complete some of these tasks before your wedding day.

How New Grads Can Master Their Finances

College graduation is a huge milestone. You’ve completed one chapter and are on the precipice of the next. While exciting, it can also be daunting – you have a whole new set of responsibilities in front of you. But take heart, we have some tips to help you navigate.

Look back to look forward. Take some time to examine your money habits. Do you have a tendency to overspend? Reward yourself with dinners out or a little retail therapy after a stressful event? Neither of these things is good or bad. They’re just choices. However, if you intentionally monitor your behavior and make necessary changes, you’ll learn how to budget early in your life. This way, you’ll set yourself up for success in the future. The truth is, a little self-awareness can go a long way.
Create a budget and stick to it. Don’t think of this as limiting. It’s simply a way to get a hold of your money and learn to live within your means. One smart way to begin is using the 50/30/20 rule: You allocate 50 percent of your earnings to your basic needs, 30 percent to your wants, and 20 percent to your savings. You can also set up short-term and long-term goals. Do you want to save for a vacation? New furniture? A new car? No matter what, start by listing ALL your expenses and then breaking them out into categories. See what you’re spending and make adjustments. To get started, here’s a free budgeting calculator.
Start saving. Right now, you might be feeling immortal. You’re young and just beginning your life. But someday, you’ll be older and need resources to live. So instead of thinking of this as taking away from your fun, think of it as paying yourself first, your future self. Whether for a getaway, an emergency, or whatever, regularly set aside some cash. But there’s more. Take advantage of savings accounts that will help you save on taxes, such as an individual retirement account (IRA) or a 401(K). Many employers offer these and even match your contributions, so don’t miss out. You want your money to work hard for you.
Pay back your student loans. It might be very tempting just to kick this to the curb. Warning: Don’t do it! Even if you have a six-month grace period. Find out what kind of loan you have: Federal or private? Subsidized or unsubsidized? If you can’t afford to pay large chunks, contact your lender and work out a plan. Another important thing is to find out whether you can deduct a portion of your student loan interest payments on your taxes. And finally, you can even investigate consolidating, refinancing, or whether you qualify for loan deferment. Just handle it. You’ll be so glad you did.
Know your worth when job hunting. Do research and find out the salary range for your level in your chosen industry. You should also examine companies. What are the benefits? If the perks are exceptional, it might be worth taking a slightly lower-paying job, depending on your situation. If you can’t negotiate your salary, ask to see if they have other perks, like helping with student loans. Another exercise is to create budgets around net salaries to get a sense of what managing your money looks like.
Vet your health insurance. Some of you might be covered on your parents’ policy until age 26. Or you might be covered by your employer. If you have insurance through your job and are in good health, a plan with a higher deductible may be a smart move. You’ll save on monthly payments and have more cash for after work.

When it comes to handling your money, all it takes is a little practice. And baby steps. Sure, you’re going to make mistakes. But jump in. Learn the ins and outs. In the end, it’s going to determine whether you remain a student or become a responsible adult.

Sources

https://www.investopedia.com/top-7-finance-tips-for-new-grads-5248426

Valuation Ratio Calculating the EV / 2P

When it comes to analyzing a company’s financials, there are many avenues we can take. One way is through multiples; calculating the EV/2P multiple is the focus of this analysis.

This ratio looks at a business’ enterprise value against its proven and probable 2P reserves. While ratios or multiples are used in valuing companies, this metric is used chiefly to value gas and oil companies for energy sector analysts. Analysts use this calculation to determine the likelihood that a company’s reserve resources can underpin its functioning and expansion efforts. Along with the ratio, analysts use micro and macro factors to determine a company’s financial health, its growth prospects, and whether the business is undervalued or overvalued.

This multiple is similar in comparison to other valuation multiples such as Price-to-Book (P/B), Price-to-Earnings (PE), Enterprise Value/Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. While these other metrics can also value an oil or gas company, understanding how it’s calculated is essential to why it is sector specific.

Breaking Down the EV/2P Ratio

EV = Market Value of Equity + Market Value of Debt – Cash and Cash Equivalents

It’s determined by the complete market worth asserted by the bond and equity holders (net of cash).

2P = Proven Reserves + Probable Reserves

The reserves of a company give analysts and investors an idea of the likelihood of the recoverability of reserves being produced and assisting the company’s growth. Proven reserves, often denoted as “P1” or “P90,” are rated at a 90 percent chance of recovering successfully. Probable reserves, also called “P50,” have a 1-in-2 chance of recovering. Both reserve types and their likelihood of being recovered are, therefore, referred to as 2P.

It’s important to note a third category referred to as “possible reserves.” This category is not factored into the company’s valuation because the 10 percent to 50 percent likelihood of reserve recoverability is too low.

Example

Illustrating how it’s calculated gives a more complete picture of how to analyze the results. For example, say a business‘ market capitalization is $200 million with a net debt of $100 million, giving it an enterprise value of $300 million. Assuming the company has $10 million of probable reserves, $20 million of proven reserves, and $15 million of possible reserves, the calculation is as follows:

EV = $300 million ($200 million + $100 million)

2P reserves = $30 million ($10 million + $20 million)

Therefore, $300 million/$30 million = $10

Every dollar of its market capitalization is worth $10 based on its 2P reserves. Once the calculation is determined, the ratio of the EV/2P is measured against the energy sector’s average ratio. The higher the EV/2P ratio, especially against its peers, the higher valuation the company has compared to other companies with the same amount of 2P reserves. The company’s shares are sold at a higher multiple than other companies.

It’s important to keep in mind that if a company’s financials are stronger or it’s more efficient and provides a better prospect for investors against its peers, its lofty valuation may be justified. It’s also important to not look at valuing companies exclusively with this ratio/multiple but also review other metrics and the macro-economic conditions before making a final investment decision.

While this multiple is primarily used for the energy industry, those who use it should be mindful to not analyze a company in that lens only, but to use a holistic analysis when valuing any type of company.

Reasons to Consider Out-of-State Municipal Bonds

Municipal bonds (also known as munis) are issued by a state or local government. Interest income is typically paid out twice a year and is not subject to federal taxes. When an investor purchases a bond issued from his own state, the income is generally not subject to state income taxes.

However, there are a few good reasons to consider buying out-of-state municipal bonds. The first reason is to consider bond quality. Each muni bond is given a quality rating based on the municipality’s ability to make the regular interest payments to investors and return their principal when the term matures. To make this determination, agencies like Moody’s and S&P evaluate the issuer’s debt structure, financial stability and long-term economic prospects.

Credit Quality

The highest Moody’s rating is Aaa (the lowest is C); a rating of Baa3 or higher is considered investment grade. The highest S&P rating is AAA (the lowest is D), and a rating of BBB or higher is considered investment grade. While it’s a good idea to invest in highly rated bonds, note that their yields are inversely related to their quality. In other words, the lower the rating, the higher the interest income. Just be sure to consider that with that higher yield comes a higher risk of the bond issuer defaulting. In today’s economic landscape, an average credit rating of AA/Aa is considered a good balance of risk and bond yield.

Diversification

Second, if the investor holds a portfolio of municipal bonds, owning some from other states can help diversify his bond portfolio. If the investor’s home state has lower-rated bonds, investing in higher-rated bonds from other states can lower his bond portfolio’s quality risk. On the other hand, if the investor’s home state has highly rated bonds, purchasing bonds from states with lower-rated bonds can increase the amount of income his portfolio pays out. Remember, too, that it’s important to consider both the bond yield (also known as its coupon rate) and its issuing state’s taxes in order to come out ahead.

More Choices

Note that both California and New York are high-tax states, so it’s particularly important to consider the tax situation before buying there. With that said, there are also good reasons to buy bonds in these two states because they offer a range of quality municipal bonds. On the flip side, some states have fewer bond options to choose from and a lower risk profile, leaving resident investors with few options regardless of the state tax benefit. Be aware that the majority of muni bonds are rated lower than AA in Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.

Tax Considerations

There are seven states that do not impose state income taxes: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming. New Hampshire recently phased out its tax on investment and interest income. If a muni bond investor lives in a state with no taxes on income, there is no benefit to limiting his purchases to in-state bonds. In this scenario, it’s a good idea to compare muni bonds from states with high-rated and high-yield bonds to build a diversified bond portfolio while also considering the annual tax bill in each of those states.

If a muni bond investor lives in a high-tax state, such as California with a 12.3 percent tax rate for residents with income in the top bracket (effectively 13.3 percent if you include the additional 1 percent surcharge on individuals earning over $1 million), then it makes sense to buy out-of-state munis to help reduce their tax burden.

Despite these general guidelines, investors should check on the muni bond tax status in their home state before making a purchase. Some states, such as Illinois, require residents to pay taxes on in-state muni bond yields. In this situation, the resident may find better deals with out-of-state munis by comparing coupon rates against the income taxes in those states.

As Tax Season Opens, We Must Stay Alert to Rising Scam Threats

As tax filing season begins, scammers are ramping up efforts to steal taxpayers’ personal information through increasingly sophisticated schemes. Below, we discuss the latest scam, what to look out for in general, and what to do if you suspect something malicious.

New Scam of the Season

The U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) recently issued an alert about a prevalent scam involving Economic Impact Payments.

In this scheme, taxpayers receive texts claiming they’re eligible for a $1,400 Economic Impact Payment, requesting personal information and bank details for deposit. While the IRS is indeed processing some legitimate Recovery Rebate Credit payments from 2021 tax returns, they will never request personal information via text or social media. These legitimate payments will be automatically distributed by late January 2025, either through direct deposit or paper check, with official notification letters sent separately.

Detecting Scam in General

The cybersecurity firm Guardio reports a 77 percent increase in IRS-related spam messages, highlighting how scammers exploit taxpayers’ fears of making mistakes on their returns. Common manipulation tactics include urgent messages claiming:

Tax return errors requiring immediate action to avoid penalties
Unexpected tax refund eligibility requiring verification
Account flags demanding immediate information verification to prevent legal action

These fraudulent messages typically contain malicious links designed to steal sensitive information like Social Security numbers, banking details, and payment credentials. They often masquerade as official IRS forms or legitimate tax advisory companies.

Key Warning Signs of Tax Scams:

Requests for sensitive personal or financial information
Links to suspicious websites (legitimate government sites end in .gov)
Misspellings, grammatical errors, or inconsistent formatting
Fuzzy or distorted official logos
Initial contact via email, phone, text, or social media instead of postal mail

What to Do if You Receive a Suspicious Message

If you receive a suspicious message, don’t engage with it. Never click links or provide personal information to unknown sources. Report potential fraud by forwarding the message to phishing@irs.gov or filing a report with TIGTA. If you’re uncertain about correspondence claiming to be from the IRS, verify it by calling 800-829-1040 or visiting IRS.gov. Your online IRS account will display any official notices mailed to you.

If you’ve accidentally engaged with a scam:

Immediately close any suspicious website tabs
Change passwords for potentially compromised accounts
Contact your bank or credit card provider to monitor for fraudulent activity
Report the incident to the IRS and file an identity theft report with the Federal Trade Commission
Consider notifying local law enforcement

When searching for tax-related information online, only use official sources like IRS.gov or the official IRS app. Be wary of sponsored ads and search results that might lead to fraudulent websites. Consider bookmarking official sites for quick, secure access.

Conclusion

Remember, the IRS will never initiate contact through email, text, or social media. When in doubt, assume it’s a scam and verify through official channels. Keeping your personal information secure requires constant vigilance, especially during tax season when scammers are most active.

Treasury Declares New Beneficial Ownership Reporting Law Will Apply Only to Foreign Companies

The Trump Administration announced it will no longer apply the beneficial ownership information (BOI) requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) to domestic companies. This declaration came first via social media, marking a significant shift in policy.

Under this new directive, U.S. businesses are exempt from the BOI reporting requirements of the CTA. The Treasury Department made the initial announcement on social media, followed by an official press release and a Truth Social post from President Donald Trump, who described the requirement as “outrageous and invasive.”

The bipartisan CTA was originally designed to combat illegal activities like drug trafficking and money laundering by limiting the use of anonymous shell companies. While the ownership information would have been available to law enforcement agencies, it would not have been publicly accessible.

In its March 3 website statement, the Treasury Department clarified that it will not enforce penalties or fines related to the BOI reporting rule under current regulatory deadlines established during the Biden Administration. Furthermore, it will not impose penalties against U.S. citizens, domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners after new rule changes are implemented.

Treasury’s proposed rules will limit required reporting to foreign companies only, though the precise scope remains unclear – whether this applies exclusively to foreign companies registered in the United States or extends to U.S. companies with foreign ownership.

Previously, reporting requirements covered all businesses formed in the United States and foreign companies registered to operate in any U.S. state or tribal territory.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which oversees CTA enforcement, appears to have been surprised by this policy change. Days earlier, following court decisions that permitted BOI reporting requirements to proceed, FinCEN had announced plans to extend reporting deadlines to March 21. As of the most recent update, FinCEN’s website has not reflected the Treasury’s announcement, and requests for comment went unanswered.

What Happens Now?

This unexpected announcement has created uncertainty for businesses, particularly regarding already-submitted data.

The law required detailed information from “beneficial owners,” including names, birthdates, addresses, and identification documents. Similar information was required from company applicants – typically individuals who helped establish the company.

Millions of companies had already complied before this announcement, raising questions about the handling of submitted information. Inquiries to FinCEN about the fate of this data have not received responses.

The status of pending legal cases also remains uncertain. Cases continue through at least four federal appellate courts, and additional litigation may emerge to compel administration compliance with the law.

Crucially, the Corporate Transparency Act itself remains valid legislation. Despite the Treasury’s position, the executive branch cannot overturn the laws passed by Congress. It can, however, choose selective enforcement – similar to approaches seen with cannabis legislation. This creates potential complications, as future administrations could reinstate full enforcement.

Understanding IRS Forms 1099 for Lawsuit Settlements

The Basics of Tax Reporting in Legal Settlements

When you collect a settlement for a lawsuit, you’ll likely also receive a Form 1099 from the IRS. This form serves as a reminder to pay taxes on your settlement; copies are sent to both you and the IRS. These forms match reported income for income tax purposes, making them critical for accurate tax filing.

In lawsuit contexts, two common forms 1099 are issued:

Form 1099-MISC: This version can include various types of settlement payments, often termed other income
Form 1099-NEC: Used specifically for non-employee compensation

Understanding the Difference Between Forms

The distinction between these forms is significant. A Form 1099-NEC informs the IRS that taxes for self-employment should be collected in addition to income taxes. This form is appropriate if you were a non-employee contractor suing for unpaid compensation.

However, in cases like wrongful termination or emotional distress claims, you’ll want the non-wage portion reported on Form 1099-MISC instead of Form 1099-NEC to avoid unnecessary self-employment taxes. Pay close attention because filing an incorrect form can be difficult to correct later.

Double Reporting: When 100% Becomes 200%

A surprising aspect of legal settlement tax reporting is that defendants often issue forms 1099 totaling 200% of the actual settlement amount.

The plaintiff receives a 1099 for 100% of the settlement
The plaintiff’s attorney receives a 1099 for 100% of the settlement

This duplicate reporting occurs because the IRS requires defendants to report the full settlement amount to both parties when payments are made jointly or through the attorney’s trust account. This is done because the defendant may not be aware of how the money is ultimately divided between client and attorney.

Legal Fees and Tax Treatment

The U.S. Supreme Court decided in the case Commissioner v. Banks that gross income for a plaintiff typically includes the part of the settlement paid to their attorney as legal fees. This means you might be taxed on money you never actually received.

To address this issue, plaintiffs should understand when they can deduct legal fees:

Plaintiffs in employment cases, civil rights cases, and most whistleblower cases qualify for deductions
Legal fees must typically be paid in the same year as the settlement (as in contingent fee arrangements)
Outside these case types, deducting legal fees becomes much more difficult
Even in personal physical injury cases, complications arise if punitive damages or interest are awarded

Tax Planning Before Settlement

It’s best to deal with tax reporting before finalizing your settlement agreement. Consider these strategies:

Include specific provisions about which forms 1099 are to be issued
Specify the recipients, amounts, and even which boxes should be completed on the forms
For physical injury cases that should be tax-free, get written commitments about tax reporting
Consider separate checks to lawyer and client when appropriate (though this may not fully prevent attribution of legal fees to plaintiffs)

Without express provisions in your settlement agreement regarding tax forms, correcting any errors later becomes extremely difficult.

Tax-Free Settlements

Some settlements can be totally free of taxation, such as cases where compensation is granted as damages for physical injury. In typical injury cases like auto accidents, damages should be tax-free, but only if there are no punitive damages and no interest as part of the settlement.

Even when you believe your settlement qualifies as tax-free, securing written confirmation about tax reporting in your settlement agreement provides important protection.

Conclusion

Understanding the tax implications of your lawsuit settlement before signing an agreement can save significant headaches and potentially reduce your tax burden. Consulting with a tax professional who specializes in legal settlements is advisable for complex cases.

Preventing a Government Shut Down, Rolling Back Regulations and Clarifying Cryptocurrency Protocols

Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 (HR 1968) – In the nick of time before the midnight deadline that would have otherwise shut down the Federal government, Congress passed a budget bill to fund the rest of the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. This bill increases funding for the military by $6 billion while reducing non-defense spending by $13 million. The federal funding bill also reduced the amount of funding for the District of Columbia (Washington D.C.) by $1.1 billion, which is paid for by local taxes. This final continuing resolution bill was passed in the House on March 11, in the Senate on March 14, and signed by the president on March 15.

District of Columbia Local Funds Act, 2025 (S 1077) – Just four hours after passing the CR budget bill, Senators passed this new bill to restore Washington funding back to 2024 levels. The reduction of more than $1 billion in funding threatens to impact police, fire, and other services in the city where much of Congress resides. The bill was introduced by Susan Collins (R-ME) and passed on March 14. It is currently under consideration in the House.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management rule relating to “Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources” (SJ Res 11) – This resolution rolls back a rule imposed during the last administration by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The revoked rule previously required oil and gas companies to identify and submit a report of potential archaeological resources on the Outer Continental Shelf seafloor that could be affected by development. The joint resolution was introduced by Sen. John Kennedy on Feb. 4. It passed in the Senate on Feb. 26 and in the House on March 6. The bill was signed by the president on March 14.

Protect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025 (HR 736) – Introduced by Rep. Zach Nunn (R-IA) on Jan. 24, this legislation passed in the House on Feb. 10 and is currently under consideration in the Senate. The purpose of the bill is to extend the filing deadline to the end of the year for businesses to report beneficial ownership information (BOI). This would give the Department of Treasury time to reconsider rules implemented during the Biden administration in order to make sure small businesses are not burdened by excessive and complex regulations.

GENIUS Act of 2025 (S 919) – This bipartisan bill was introduced by Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) on March 10. It would establish licensing and regulatory requirements for stablecoins, which are cryptocurrency tokens used in the crypto economy and traditional financial markets. Among its provisions, the bill would enable states to regulate stablecoin issuers with a market capitalization of under $10 billion, while larger issuers would be regulated at the federal level. This bipartisan legislation is currently in the early stages of committee reporting.

Author: Service2Client